Search found 80 matches

by emsiwx
Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:11 pm
Forum: UEMS v18.x support
Topic: Something "strange"??? with total cld cover
Replies: 4
Views: 273

Re: Something "strange"??? with total cld cover

Hi again, I just can't help myself asking... Do you really think, it is ok for 24h average to get such a "nice milky" look, 100% coverage like that? I have never ever seen the outputs liked that. http://www.pocasie-bytca.sk/downloads/cld1.png Thank you again in advance for your opinions/comments. Ma...
by emsiwx
Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:29 pm
Forum: UEMS v18.x support
Topic: Something "strange"??? with total cld cover
Replies: 4
Views: 273

Re: Something "strange"??? with total cld cover

Hi Ivan,

many thanks for your reply. I thought, it could be the fog, or before, when Saharan dust was quite heavyly affecting EU.... I am using Monthly Aerosol db for init.

Did not think, a fog could be so intense, and make such a sudden difference compared to previous runs.

Thank you.

Marian
by emsiwx
Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:47 pm
Forum: UEMS v18.x support
Topic: Something "strange"??? with total cld cover
Replies: 4
Views: 273

Something "strange"??? with total cld cover

Hi, has anyone noticed somehow strange total cloud cover, lately? Most visible over the sea, sharp 100% cloud cover , following the cost, and over the land nothing? Seems strange to me, compared to forecasts, approx. 1-2 weeks ago, or maybe the same time, when Ptiles download problem occured. Runnin...
by emsiwx
Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:30 pm
Forum: UEMS v18.x support
Topic: start a simulation after 48 hours
Replies: 2
Views: 509

Re: start a simulation after 48 hours

Hi,

I hope I get you well.

In ems_autorun.conf edit:

INITFH=48
BCFREQ=01 or 03 based on your dset
LENGTH=72

Rgds,

Marian
by emsiwx
Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:54 am
Forum: UEMS v18.x support
Topic: UEMS/WRF EMS 18.x
Replies: 15
Views: 1854

Re: UEMS/WRF EMS 18.x

Using install script sent by Robert, I am getting also 15.99.8. Is it just a typo,or something is wrong?
by emsiwx
Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:44 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts
Replies: 8
Views: 1658

Re: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts

Since I switched to adaptive ts, 5 runs so far, total run time ranging from 3:14 to 3:16. I realize you said it should be the same within a minute if not within few seconds, but for me this not only almost half the time compared to auto_s, but so far the range is not half an hour like before. Anyway...
by emsiwx
Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:33 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts
Replies: 8
Views: 1658

Re: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts

Yes , the PC is dedicated only to WRF, even more only for pure computing, all Grads and other jobs are taken by another PC.

Using all 10 cores... when I left 1 core free, the run time was slower. (But that was on Auto_S, I can try with adaptive time step.)
by emsiwx
Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:05 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts
Replies: 8
Views: 1658

Re: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts

Hi Ivan, so here are my findings: Running just single domain: time is inconsistent on both settings (adaptive/fixed). Running mother + one nested domain (12/4km) : adaptive - inconsistent when calc mother domain, all times for nested domain are OK. Fixed - both mother and nested domain times are inc...
by emsiwx
Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:39 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts
Replies: 8
Views: 1658

Re: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts

I will try the next run, now I have one running. I will let you know.

Marian
by emsiwx
Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:01 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts
Replies: 8
Views: 1658

Re: Inconsistent time per timestep using adaptive ts

Hi Ivan, I did not think of this as a problem, before you posted your experience. I face the same thing on my Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 (Procesor 10-Core, 2.20GHz (85W), TurboBoost 3.1GHz, HT, 25MB L3 cache, socket 2011-3, 14nm, Broadwell) with 2x Corsair 16GB KIT DDR4 2133MHz CL15 Vengeance LPX , Quad ...