Yes,
It is a general tendency. Stratus and stratocumulus cloud cover is underestimated. I have tried to increase the number of levels but it didn't help.
Search found 101 matches
- Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:19 pm
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Underestimated cloud cover
- Replies: 5
- Views: 274
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:25 am
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Underestimated cloud cover
- Replies: 5
- Views: 274
Re: Underestimated cloud cover
Hello norulz,
What version of WRF (UEMS) are you using ?
What happens if you compare with real observations, not only from other model outputs ?
Do the differences come from convective clouds only or from other types of clouds ?
What version of WRF (UEMS) are you using ?
What happens if you compare with real observations, not only from other model outputs ?
Do the differences come from convective clouds only or from other types of clouds ?
- Sun Oct 04, 2020 11:22 am
- Forum: EMS Hacking
- Topic: EMS UPP and regular WRF4.2
- Replies: 0
- Views: 914
EMS UPP and regular WRF4.2
Hello everybody,
Has anyone tried to post process a "standard" WRF v4.2 output file (wrfout_d01xxx) with EMS UPP ?
Thank you
Has anyone tried to post process a "standard" WRF v4.2 output file (wrfout_d01xxx) with EMS UPP ?
Thank you
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:24 pm
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
wrfm_arw.exe and wrfm_real.exe
I have also tried all the available intel compiled libraries. Never tried wrfm_arw.exe alone.
I have also tried all the available intel compiled libraries. Never tried wrfm_arw.exe alone.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:48 pm
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
Hello meteo60, I use Centos 7. I have tried the standard kernel 3.10 and also the newest kernel 5.2. No change. I can set OMP_STACKSIZE at any arbitrary high value but no change. Other strange behaviour : I have a very large domain but with DX = 25km. This one runs but all the wrfout files seem corr...
- Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:56 am
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
Hello meteo60, In the newest UEMS version I have a similar problem. The intel libraries worked fine by setting unlimited stack size and OMP_STACKSIZE at an arbitrary high value, for the previous UEMS version. But with this newest UEMS version, it doesn't work. I have the same 174 SIGSERV error, and ...
- Thu May 23, 2019 9:06 pm
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
Thanks god it's working !!!!!!!!!! :D :mrgreen: Oh dear , I am shocked !! I mean it is working with uems intel compiled binaries ! It is approximately faster than PGI compiled binaries by approximately 20-30% on my system. I have found the solution by digging deeper and deeper into the internet. See...
- Sat May 18, 2019 10:52 am
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
@meteoadriatic
I didn't try yet...
I didn't try yet...
- Thu May 16, 2019 6:21 pm
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
Hello Pattim,
It is V 19.5.1.
I have asked Robert but he doesn't know how to troubleshoot it
It is V 19.5.1.
I have asked Robert but he doesn't know how to troubleshoot it

- Sun May 12, 2019 10:54 am
- Forum: UEMS v18 and higher support
- Topic: Intel libraries
- Replies: 21
- Views: 14059
Re: Intel libraries
Hello,
It still doesn't work on my machine. Intel Core i7 8086K
I have tried to compile WRF from scratch with the intel compiler, last version 2019, old version 2015 , intermediate version 2017 : but same problem. Same SIGSERV error 174.
It still doesn't work on my machine. Intel Core i7 8086K
I have tried to compile WRF from scratch with the intel compiler, last version 2019, old version 2015 , intermediate version 2017 : but same problem. Same SIGSERV error 174.
