Search found 58 matches

by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 8:19 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 29813

Re: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"

Now this gets interesting... I am running ems_install version 2010.03.19, which should correspond to WRF v3.1.1.

How can I make the necessary changes to ungrib/metgrid or the Vtable? gfs fallback is definitely an important point for me.

Thanks again!

Jonas
by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 7:37 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 29813

Re: Crash in real.exe

The last successful run using gfs as input was based on yesterday's GFS 06Z run. All runs afterwards gave me this error including the most recent (0Z) one. At the moment my model is just running fine using gfsptile based on 0Z, I have not tested gfsptile for the runs before.
by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 7:28 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 29813

Re: Crash in real.exe

Hello,

after some reading this was exactly what I changed right now... I was using gfs, and now switched to gfsptile and everything seems to be working again. How can this happen?

Thanks!

Jonas
by j0nes2k
Wed May 23, 2012 7:02 am
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"
Replies: 28
Views: 29813

Crash in real.exe "troubles, could not find trapping x locations"

Hello, I am running WRFEMS for two different models, one over Europe and one over Egypt. However since some runs the Europe model fails in the real.exe part: d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 Timing for input 1 s. d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 flag_soil_layers read from met_em file is 1 d01 2012-05-23_03:00:00 Old ...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:02 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Run simulation in two parts / restarts
Replies: 3
Views: 5336

Re: Run simulation in two parts / restarts

Hello, ah, didn't know about this option (never used it before) - seems like this is just what I needed! However it is not that well documented as the rest of the EMS system, so I have another question regarding the autopost option: My EMS output is normally a monolithic GrADS file. How does this wo...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:17 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Run simulation in two parts / restarts
Replies: 3
Views: 5336

Run simulation in two parts / restarts

Hello, I am running real-time forecasts based on the GFS model. My forecasts are initialized with the 00-hour forecast and run up to +78 hours. As the computation takes quite some time and I want to see the first results earlier and so that I don't have to wait until the complete simulation has ende...
by j0nes2k
Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:10 pm
Forum: Legacy EMS (WRFEMS 3.2 and lower) support
Topic: Which Linux distro for WRF EMS - Debian or?
Replies: 5
Views: 6722

Re: Which Linux distro for WRF EMS - Debian or?

Hello,

I am running WRF EMS on Debian without any problems, both on 32bit and 64bit architecture.

Best regards,
Jonas
by j0nes2k
Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:12 pm
Forum: Hardware for running WRF / EMS
Topic: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives
Replies: 3
Views: 5047

Re: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives

Hello,

thank you for your answer! I think I can save the money and buy a more powerful CPU then :)

Best regards,
Jonas
by j0nes2k
Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:26 pm
Forum: Hardware for running WRF / EMS
Topic: Speed improvement through SSD hard drives
Replies: 3
Views: 5047

Speed improvement through SSD hard drives

Hello, I am thinking about getting a new server for my WRF model computations, and I am wondering about the hardware specs I should use for that. Obviously the most important thing is CPU power, but I am wondering what to do about harddrives in general. I know that SSD drives can give a significant ...
by j0nes2k
Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:44 pm
Forum: General NWP, Postprocessing, Meteorology
Topic: WRF EMS Clouds too low in % (ARW core)
Replies: 19
Views: 25246

Re: WRF EMS Cloud's to low in %

Hello,

another thing that came to my mind: which fields do you extract via wrfpost? I currently only extract about 10 variables, mostly surface related. Do I have to include other output variables to get better cloud cover data?

Best regards,
Jonas Kaufmann